Ch. 1.4. Primary Source: The Glorious Revolution and the English Bill of Rights, 1688-89

The Glorious Revolution, 1688-89

James II’s Abdication, 1688. The dramatic culmination of the drawn-out struggles between the kings of the Stuart Dynasty and Parliament came in 1688. In that year the birth of James II’s son (also James) finally united Whigs and Tories in opposition to what they saw as the likely establishment of a Catholic dynasty in England (because his presumably Catholic son would become king instead of his Protestant daughter Mary). Therefore they invited William of Orange, who was Mary’s husband and an important Protestant leader in the Netherlands, to take the crown from James. In Nov., 1688, William landed in England with a seasoned army and won a few minor battles. James panicked, fleeing to France in December. Parliamentary leaders considered this an abdication of the throne.

 

William and Mary, 1689-94. In early 1689 (Feb.-March), Parliament acknowledged William and Mary as joint monarchs, after William had agreed to be co-ruler with Mary and after he had assented to the Declaration of Right, which set out limits on royal power.

The Bill of Rights, 1689

Parliament’s Victory: The Declaration of Right was restated in statutory form in Dec., 1689, as the Bill of Rights, which confirmed Parliament’s power to control taxes and other traditional liberties. Parliament had thus successfully and with very little bloodshed deposed a king and installed his successors. This revolution strongly confirmed the rule of law under a limited, constitutional monarchy, one in which Parliament was now the dominant power—as it has remained ever since.

 

Key Guarantees: The Bill of Rights also guaranteed a number of other key political and civil rights, including free speech (at least for members of Parliament), the right to bear arms (at least for Protestants), the right to petition the government for grievances, etc. Although social elites (especially the ‘gentry’) would long continue to control Parliament politically, they did so in the name of the English people as a whole, and the members of the House of Commons, which dominated Parliament, served as elected representatives of local districts.

Thus the Glorious Revolution marks the end of true monarchical rule, the advent of a Parliamentary or republican form of government, and a shift in the justification for government from divine right to popular sovereignty—the idea that the people themselves are sovereign.

 

An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown… Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counselors…, did endeavor to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;

 

[a] [laws] By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;

[b] [petitions] By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates for humbly petitioning to be excused from concurring to the said assumed power;

[c] [courts] By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes;

[d] [taxes] By levying money for and to the use of the Crown by pretense of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Parliament;

[e] [army & quartering] By raising and keeping a standing army within this kingdom in time of peace without consent of Parliament, and quartering soldiers contrary to law;

[f] [bearing arms] By causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;

[g] [elections] By violating the freedom of election of members to serve in Parliament;

[h] [courts] By prosecutions in the Court of King’s Bench for matters and causes cognizable only in Parliament, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses;

[i] [juries] And whereas of late years partial corrupt and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials, and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason which were not freeholders;

[j] [bail & fines] And excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases to elude the benefit of the laws made for the liberty of the subjects;  [k] And excessive fines have been imposed;

[l] [punishment] And illegal and cruel punishments inflicted; …

[m] And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures before any conviction or judgment against the persons upon whom the same were to be levied;

 

All which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this realm. And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government and the throne being thereby vacant…

 

And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons…, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, …do in the first place…, for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties, declare:

 

[1] [laws] That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;

[2] [laws] That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;

[3] [courts] That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;

[4] [taxes] That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretense of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;

[5] [petitions] That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;

[6] [army] That the raising or keeping of a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;

[7] [bearing arms] That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;

[8] [elections] That election of members of Parliament ought to be free;

[9] [freedom of speech] That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;

[10] [bail & fines] That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted;

[11] [juries] That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders;

[12] That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void;

[13] [Parliament] And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, Parliaments ought to be held frequently.

 

And they do claim, demand and insist upon all and singular the premises as their undoubted rights and liberties… Having therefore an entire confidence that his Highness the prince of Orange will…preserve them from the violation of their rights which they have here asserted…, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster do resolve that William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, be and be declared king and queen of England, France and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging… [and those present took oaths of allegiance and loyalty to the new monarchs, and the new monarchs swore to uphold these rights].

License

American Legal History to the 1860s Copyright © 2020 by Richard Keyser. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book